Any article listed below does not necessarily reflect the opinion or endorsement of The PA Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs, Inc. (PFSC)

 

NOTICE: In compliance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed free without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only.

 

Be sure to check out our Legislative Alerts pages to follow legislation PFSC is tracking.

 

 

 

August 2007

 

8/31/07

PICS Shutdown Update

 

The plaintiff's attorney did not have anyone for the plaintiff's (gun dealers) available for testimony. 

 

Not having anyone there to testify that the shutdown at this time would cause them an "economic hardship"....the judge had no choice but to dismiss the request for an injunction to delay the shutdown. 

 

The IT witness for the plaintiffs seemed to have the judge convinced the process could have been completed without a complete shutdown, but because they didn't have anyone to testify that a shutdown would cause anyone harm....the judge had to dismiss the motion for an injunction.  Case over.  Shutdown begins Sunday at 6 PM.

 

For more on the story:

 

Pa. court declines to halt gun sales database shutdown

 

By MARTHA RAFFAELE Associated Press Writer

Article Launched: 08/31/2007 12:17:26 PM EDT

http://www.ydr.com/newsfull/ci_6770008

 

HARRISBURG, Pa.—A judge on Friday ruled that the state police can go forward with a three-day hiatus in gun sales so the agency can upgrade its background check computer system.

Commonwealth Court Judge Keith Quigley said he would not intervene, despite being asked to do so by gun dealers and a state lawmaker.

The ruling allows gun sales to stop in Pennsylvania starting at 6 p.m. Sunday. Gov. Ed Rendell said earlier this week the work should be finished and the system back online by Wednesday evening.

No gun dealers appeared in court, and Quigley agreed with state police lawyers who argued a gun dealer should not be allowed to testify by phone. That left no testimony to back up the assertion that the shutdown would be costly for the businesses.

"I haven't seen any harm," Quigley said. "I can't presume that."

C. Robert Keenan III, a lawyer for the more than two dozen gun dealers and state Rep. Tim Solobay, D-Washington, said the emergency injunction request would not be appealed.

"The rigid ideological climate of this administration prevented it from seeing any different approach to this," he said.

A separate application for a permanent injunction to prevent any similar shutdowns in the future is still pending.

State police notified gun dealers of the computer work earlier this month, but lawmakers who head the sportsmen's caucus also protested, particularly because it coincided with the first few days of dove and Canada geese hunting season.

Rendell decided to proceed with the shutdown after hearing from a panel that suggested either a transition that would not interrupt Pennsylvania Instant Check System service at all or shutdowns in October or early January.

Rendell said those options either conflicted with other scheduled computer work or were too costly, but said the shutdown would last about a day shorter than previously announced.

State police operators will accept calls while the system is down, but checks will not be processed during that period.

The system, which uses 1981 technology, provides criminal background information for schools, courts, federal agencies and local law enforcement.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

August 29, 2007
GOVERNOR GOES AGAINST PANEL RECOMMENDATION

MOVES FORWARD WITH SHUTDOWN


For more information contact:

Melody Zullinger

717-232-3480

info@pfsc.org

 

For immediate release

 

GOVERNOR GOES AGAINST PANEL RECOMMENDATION

MOVES FORWARD WITH SHUTDOWN

 

On August 21, 2007 the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) announced its plan to shut down the Pennsylvania Instant Check System (PICS) for upgrades. The planned shutdown would begin Sunday, September 2nd at 6 pm and last until Thursday, September 6th at Noon.  These dates will coincide with the beginning of the Dove and Canadian Geese hunting seasons, as well as Labor Day sales events scheduled for many firearm retailers. 

 

Firearm dealers in Pennsylvanian, who will lose revenue during the shut down, were not given sufficient notice; the notice letter was dated August 8, 2007, but many dealers did not receive it until August 15, 2007.  

 

As opposition to this shutdown mounted, Governor Rendell formed an Ad Hoc Panel to discuss options to make this shutdown less inconvenient to dealers, sportsmen and other groups with a vested interest in keeping PICS operational.  The panel, of which PFSC Executive Director Melody Zullinger was a member, recommended the PSP go back to the vender and explore options for something other than a complete shut down.  Recognizing the chance of this happening was slim to none, the panel then suggested delaying the upgrade until January 2008. 

 

“The panel even recognized that postponing till January may not be a financially feasible option, so we agreed that any delay would be better than none, so as not to interfere with already scheduled special Labor Day sales events,” said Ms. Zullinger.

 

Late afternoon, on August 28, 2007, Governor Ed Rendell announced that the upgrade to PICS would move forward as originally planned, but stated the system would be back on line by 6 pm Wednesday September 5th, instead of noon Thursday.  In the end, the governor disregarded all the recommendations from his panel, deciding the options, which included no shutdown at all or shutting down in October or early January, would be either too costly or conflict with other scheduled computer system upgrades.   Zullinger said, “The issue of other scheduled computer upgrades was never mentioned as being a conflict during their meeting.”

 

The sporting community, lead by the Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs, as well as several members of the panel, were completely taken aback when they heard Rendell’s decision.  “We left the meeting Monday believing that we would at the least, see a temporary delay,” said Zullinger.  “But instead we find out that it’s more important to do what’s less intrusive for the agency than it is to consider the economic concerns of the firearm retailers.”

 

The Pennsylvania Association of Firearms Retailers and the National Association of Firearms Retailers (NAFR), a division of NSSF, announced today they will be joining a lawsuit filed by 26 Firearm Dealers and the Allegheny Co. Sportsmen’s League against the Rendell administration to stop the PICS outage. The case is set to be heard Friday, August 31 in Harrisburg.

  

Representing nearly 100,00 sportsmen and women, the mission of the Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs, Inc. is to provide a statewide, united voice for the concerns of all sportsmen and conservationists, to ensure their rights and interests are protected and to protect and enhance the environment and our natural resources.  The PFSC has 75 years of experience fighting for Pennsylvanians’ rights and privileges to hunt, fish, trap, shoot and boat, and for the conservation of the Commonwealth’s natural resources.

 

###

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance

801 Kingsmill Parkway, Columbus, OH 43229

Ph. 614/888-4868 • Fax 614/888-0326

Website: www.ussportsmen.org • E-mail: info@ussportsmen.org

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE      

Contact: Beth Ruth (614) 888-4868 ext. 214

Aug. 17, 2007

 

State Must Give Increased Dog Law Enforcement a Chance to Work

 

(Columbus) – Sportsmen want Pennsylvania to scrap new dog care regulations that will eliminate hunting with dogs while new enforcement measures for dog law violators are implemented and evaluated.

 

On Aug. 15, the attorney general’s office granted a recent Department of Agriculture request to allow prosecutors to try criminal cases dealing with the state dog law. The department had been requiring law enforcement officials, not lawyers, to represent the state in such cases. According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, prosecutors have been acting strictly as advisors to dog wardens who have often been unable to convict animal abusers, many of whom are represented by professional attorneys.

 

While violators escaped justice, the department has pursued a restrictive set of new regulations that will put sporting dog kennels and hobby breeders out of business. Breeders who can afford to remain in operation after complying with the regulations will be forced to raise prices, since the state estimates the cost of implementation will be as much as $10,000 per breeder. These factors will leave hunters seeking to buy quality puppies to retrieve ducks, chase rabbits or point pheasants high and dry.

 

The regulations were proposed at the direction of Gov. Ed Rendell, whose stated goal is to “remove the stain of puppy mills from the commonwealth.” Unfortunately, the proposal will reach far beyond that target.

 

“The regulations will apply to the hobbyist the same as it will to the large commercial breeder,” explained Rob Sexton, U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance vice president for government affairs. “It makes as much sense as having the same worker rules for U.S. Steel as for a neighborhood lemonade stand.”

 

The USSA and its allies in the fast-growing Sporting Dog Defense Coalition have tried for months to convince the Department of Agriculture to withdraw the regulations and rewrite the dog law to create a distinction between commercial operations and hobbyists. Sportsmen have repeatedly inquired whether there is sufficient enforcement ability to address abusive breeders. The exposé by the Philadelphia Inquirer and the resultant request by the Rendell administration to the attorney general prove that enforcement has been lacking.

 

Sportsmen’s groups continue to implore the department to abandon the meat-cleaver approach to the problem and give the new prosecutorial abilities a chance to show results. They have also committed to help change the dog law, which will allow the department to isolate the abusive commercial breeders.

 

However, the Department of Agriculture insists that the regulations continue to move forward. Making matters worse, recent rhetoric from the agency and the governor’s office refers to a need for “uniform regulations that apply to all kennels” in Pennsylvania.

 

A one-size-fits-all policy has contributed to many hunters’ beliefs that there is an anti-hunting agenda behind the effort.

 

“Hunters support bringing abusive commercial breeders to justice,” said Sexton. “However, the governor and the Department of Agriculture know how sportsmen will be hurt by the proposed rules, so our members and allies wonder who is behind the continual push that ignores hunters’ pleas.”

 

The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) and the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), both support a ban on hunting and have advocated strongly for the regulations.

 

Sportsmen must continue to urge Gov. Ed Rendell to withdraw the dog care regulations. For a sample letter, use the Legislative Action Center  at www.ussportsmen.org to take action. Send letters to Gov. Ed Rendell, 225 Main Capitol Building, Harrisburg, PA, 17120. Sportsmen should also take time to call the governor’s office and leave a message opposing the regulations. Phone: (717) 787-2500. Fax (717) 772-8284.

 

The U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance is a national association of sportsmen and sportsmen’s organization that protects the rights of hunters, anglers and trappers in the courts, legislatures, at the ballot, in Congress and through public education programs. For more information about the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance and its work, call (614) 888-4868 or visit its website, www.ussportsmen.org.

 

-30-

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Pittsburgh Tribune

By The Associated Press

 

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/breaking/s_522687.html


Friday, August 17, 2007

 

PHILADELPHIA -- Authorities on Thursday announced arrest warrants for 17 people accused of illegally buying guns for felons, part of their effort to round up people known as straw purchasers.

 

The warrants were issued -- and 51 weapons, including a machine gun, were seized -- through the efforts of a gun violence task force formed in December, state Attorney General Tom Corbett and Philadelphia District Attorney Lynne Abraham said at a news conference.

 

Felons are prohibited from owning firearms and typically enlist the straw purchasers, who then report the guns as stolen in an attempt to avoid liability if the weapons are used in a crime.

 

Read more…….

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

A different kind of warden to take helm of Wisconsin DNR:

 

    Wisconsin Governor Jim Doyle is handing over administration of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to the state’s former Department of Corrections Secretary, Matt Frank, reports the Wildlife Management Institute.

 

  Frank, a veteran of the Wisconsin Department of Justice, was appointed following Scott Hassett’s July 16 announcement of the termination of his four-year tenure as DNR Secretary. The change will take effect on September 1.

 

  A 1981 University of Wisconsin Law School graduate, Frank served 22 years as Assistant Attorney General for the Wisconsin Department of Justice, mostly under then-Attorney General Doyle. Previous to his appointment by Doyle as Department of Corrections Secretary in 2003, Frank spent six years overseeing the state’s environmental defense and enforcement actions. In a press release issued by the Governor’s office, Frank is touted as “an avid outdoorsman [who]…enjoys camping, hiking, biking, fishing, canoeing, kayaking and recreational boating with family and friends.”

 

  While Hassett (also an attorney and former newspaper publisher, and 2003 Doyle appointee) cited personal rather than political reasons for his decision to leave the agency, speculation among state conservationists attributes his resignation to the Doyle administration’s ill-disguised desire to wield more control over the DNR. Hassett’s announcement was greeted generally with surprise and curiosity. The Governor’s action was greeted generally with skepticism and little surprise.

 

  Frank is not the first Doyle appointment of a political loyalist to a top, current DNR post. In January, the Governor replaced long-time DNR employee and Deputy Secretary Bill Smith with Randy Romanski, Doyle’s deputy chief of staff for the previous two years. Although not confirmed by the Governor’s office, Doyle apparently believes that managing Wisconsin’s natural resources is accomplished best by lawyers with no natural resource management background or experience rather than by actual, professional, natural resource managers.

 

  Before 1995, the authority to appoint the DNR Secretary was held by Wisconsin’s Natural Resource Board (NRB), a citizen-based conservation coalition organized in 1928 to reduce the influence of politics in conservation. However, its role was changed 12 years ago by then-Governor Tommy Thompson, who made the DNR Secretary position a cabinet appointment. Doyle’s recent political shuffle has prompted many in the conservation community to prioritize actions that would reverse the appointment process. Senate Bill 15, currently before the Wisconsin 2007-09 Legislature, would place the responsibility of selecting the DNR secretary back with the NRB. According to Anne Sayers, program director for the Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters Institute, some 50 independent conservation organizations have endorsed the bill and have selected it as one of four 2007-08 Wisconsin Conservation Priorities (see www.conservationvoters.org/WLCVI/Public/index.php?custID=20).  (mcd)

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Research to study wildlife-wind energy conflict areas approved

 

Link:  http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=18697005&BRD=2715&PAG=461&dept_id=558782&rfi=6

 

The News Item

08/14/2007

 

The Center for Rural Pennsylvania’s Board of Directors this week approved a research project that will develop a statewide tool for evaluating potential conflict areas between protected or sensitive wildlife species and commercial windpower developments.

Sen. John R. Gordner, chairman of the Center for Rural Pennsylvania, said the research would provide municipalities who are considering permits for wind turbines in their communities with another valuable tool for siting the structures.

Dr. Brian W. Okey, of Indiana University of Pennsylvania, will conduct the research, which is scheduled to begin in December. The research will focus on areas of the state with Class 4 winds, which are winds that consistently flow at around 16 miles per hour, as these areas are typically sought after by energy developers. Dr. Okey will use a Geographic Information System to link a wildlife sensitivity database with Class 4 wind area data. Municipalities may then use the resulting maps to quickly identify zones, which may have the least impact on wildlife, for wind energy development.

The project was approved during the center’s quarterly board meeting, which was held in Lock Haven, and hosted by Sen. John Wozniak, center board treasurer, whose 35th Senatorial District includes Clinton and Cambria counties, and parts of Centre, Clearfield and Somerset counties.

At the meeting, Dr. Anastasia Snyder, Dr. Diane McLaughlin and Mary Ann Demi of
Pennsylvania State University, updated the board on the longitudinal research project they are conducting on the education and career aspirations of rural students. The project, which is sponsored by the center, began in 2005, and is following groups of 7th- and 11th-grade students through high school and beyond.

The center’s board then toured the Wayne Township Landfill, which is operated by the Clinton County Solid Waste Authority. The board learned of the landfill’s innovative operating techniques, free tire and household hazardous waste collection events, and recycling and landscape mulch programs.

In addition to Gordner, who serves the 27th Senatorial District, which includes all of Columbia, Northumberland, Montour and Snyder counties and parts of Luzerne and Dauphin counties, and Sen. Wozniak, the center’s board also includes; Rep. Tina Pickett, who represents the 110th District, which includes Sullivan County and parts of Bradford and Susquehanna counties; Rep. Tim Seip, who represents the 125th legislative district, which includes parts of Schuylkill and Berks counties; Dr. C. Shannon Stokes, professor of Rural Sociology in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology at Penn State University; Dr. Keith T. Miller, president of Lock Haven University; Dr. Nancy Falvo, director of Clarion University’s Health Science Education Center; Dr. Stephan J. Goetz, executive director of the Northeast Regional Center for Rural Development; Dr. Robert F. Pack, vice provost for Academic Planning and Resources Management at the University of Pittsburgh; Steve Crawford, Gov. Edward Rendell’s secretary for Legislative Affairs; and William Sturgis, executive director of the Pennsylvania Rural Development Council.

The Center for Rural Pennsylvania is a bipartisan, bicameral legislative agency that serves as a resource for rural policy research within the Pennsylvania General Assembly. It was created in 1987 under Act 16, the Rural Revitalization Act, to promote and sustain the vitality of
Pennsylvania’s rural and small communities.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 Railroad joins Little Juniata River access fight

Exclusive club told to remove fencing, no trespassing signs

Link:    http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/07220/807724-85.stm

By Deborah Weisberg, Special to the Post-Gazette
8/8/2007

As state attorneys and Donny Beaver prepare to do battle in a state appeals court over access to the Little Juniata River, another matter is unfolding along its banks.

Norfolk Southern Corp. has ordered Mr. Beaver, operator of the exclusive Spring Ridge Club, to immediately remove barbed wire and "no trespassing" signs from railroad property along the stream. If he fails to do so within 10 days, Norfolk Southern will perform the task and might bill him for the work, according to Norfolk Southern attorney Randal S. Noe, who made the demands in an Aug. 3 letter to Mr. Beaver.

Mr. Noe said yesterday that he doesn't know when the barbed wire and signs were erected, but the railroad only recently was made aware of them. The "no trespassing" signs bear the names of the Spring Ridge Club and Legacy Conservation Group, two of several corporations Mr. Beaver has or had an interest in. The barbed wire is strung among dense brush downstream of Spruce Creek.

"We were advised by a third party of [the wire and signs'] existence," said Mr. Noe. "We weren't aware of anything before that. But once we became aware, we got concerned."

Although Mr. Beaver leases a small, relatively narrow strip of land from the railroad along the Little Juniata, Mr. Noe said the signs and barbed wire are beyond the leased section. He also said that while the railroad "does not want to get in the middle of a dispute between the state and Don Beaver ... when [Beaver] allegedly invaded our property, we felt it was our duty to react."

Mr. Beaver declined to comment.

In the Aug. 3 letter to Mr. Beaver, Norfolk Southern demanded "the immediate removal of any barbed wire, fencing, barriers, signs or other material placed on our property by you, your employees, or agents." It further stated that the railroad company would inspect the property in about 10 days, remove and dispose of any such material and "reserve the right" to seek recovery of payment for the cost.

Three state agencies, including the Department of Environmental Protection, and local fishing guide Allan Bright sued Mr. Beaver and the club four years ago because they treated a 1.3-mile section of the river near Spruce Creek as members-only water.

Earlier this year, Huntingdon County Common Pleas Judge Stewart Kurtz ruled in the state's favor. Subsequently, Mr. Beaver was ordered not to post or hang signs on the stream, not to "threaten, harass or otherwise attempt to exclude the public" from the water and streambed, and not to advertise the river as private.

In recent months, however, "no trespassing" signs and metal posts with bright orange caps had been posted in and along the Little Juniata on the side opposite the railroad tracks, where Mr. Beaver owns land for the Spring Ridge Club, a private fishing organization that charges up to $80,000 for membership and thousands more in annual fees. The metal posts and most of those signs have since been removed.

Mr. Beaver appealed the judge's decision last month in a case that probably will be argued early next year.

Stan Stein, the attorney for Mr. Bright, who is seeking damages over income he claims he lost for all those years that the club advertised the Little Juniata as private, said the railroad issue "will have no effect on the appeal, but it may have an effect on how and whether the court might be asked to enforce the court order."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 

August 7, 2007
Safety Briefings Slated For Fort Indiantown Gap Hunters and Wood Gatherers

 

http://sites.state.pa.us:80/PA_Exec/Military_Affairs/DMVA/1802.htm


Major Changes for Hunters to be Implemented

FORT INDIANTOWN
GAP – Outdoor enthusiasts wishing to use Fort Indiantown Gap for hunting, fishing or wood gathering in 2007-08 will be required to attend a mandatory safety briefing and pay a $20 conservation fee.

The briefings will highlight the changes for this upcoming season, including a lottery system for deer season (formally known as rifle season) and the “earn a buck” policy for archery hunters.
The lottery system will require those who wish to hunt for deer season to pay an additional $5 fee, which will be used to manage a program so make sure the number of hunters do not exceed what natural resources can support.

The “earn a buck” policy requires doe hunters to first harvest a doe before they can harvest a buck. This is designed to help better manage the population in the archery-only hunting areas at Fort Indiantown Gap.

Briefings are scheduled for the following dates and times:

• Aug. 21 at
7 p.m.;
• Aug. 28 at
7 p.m.; and
• Sept. 23 at
2 p.m.

Participants only need to attend one briefing; each will be held at Fort Indiantown Gap in Building #8-80 off of Service Road and will last approximately two hours.

The mandatory $20 conservation fee and the optional $5 lottery fee covers the 2007 and 2008 hunting seasons. All fees collected are used for the protection, conservation and management of fish and wildlife at Fort Indiantown Gap, including habitat restoration and improvement, biologist staff and support costs, as well as related activities.

Individuals wishing to hunt must bring a valid hunting license, current driver’s license and vehicle registration. Wood gatherers must bring a current driver’s license and vehicle registration. Photocopies are acceptable. Anyone under the age of 18 is required to be accompanied by a parent or legal guardian. Applicants who attended a safety briefing in 2006 do not need to attend this year.

For more information call the Fort Indiantown Gap outdoor recreation program coordinator at (717) 861-2150.

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Save HSCA

By Brian J. Hill

8-8-07

The fact that the general public doesn't know much about the Hazardous Sites Cleanup Program speaks to its success. The fact that the program's funding is about to run out should be alarming.

When the governor and General Assembly return to work on legislation in mid-September, they'll only have a few days to find a solution to the problem of how to fund the critical Hazardous Sites Cleanup Program before its money runs out in October.

A last-minute proposal to take money away from the Keystone Recreation, Parks and Conservation Fund was wisely shot down by a bipartisan group of legislators before the final budget was adopted in July. However, the question of how to provide dedicated, long-term funding for the valuable Hazardous Sites Program was left hanging.

Established in 1988, the program provides the resources needed to respond to and eliminate immediate threats to public health and safety from toxic substances found on industrial sites or spilled in accidents.

The Department of Environmental Protection has a list of nearly 150 sites, including 45 in Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware and Montgomery Counties, that have been cleaned up under the program or still need to be cleaned up. These sites threaten the water we drink, the air we breathe, and undermine economic revitalization.

But the program does more:

It helps finance cleanup projects at abandoned industrial facilities and contaminated sites.

It supports Pennsylvania's nationally recognized land recycling and brownfield redevelopment efforts.

And it provides nonhazardous environmental response funding, such as cleanup activities after floods.

Everyone in Harrisburg agrees the program is important. What they cannot agree on is how to put together the approximately $40 million needed annually to fund the program.

A proposed $2.25 fee on municipal waste disposed in the state was proposed by Gov. Rendell as part of the budget in February. Other legislators have suggested earmarking part of the corporate net income tax or the capital stock and franchise tax to support the program. The $650 million budget surplus for this year or a portion of the state's Rainy Day Fund could also be used.

One creative solution might be to use some of the $360 million legislators set aside for their own projects - called WAMs, or "walking-around money" - in this year's budget. What better way to make an impact on your community than to clean up a toxic-waste site? And taking a small amount from each caucus in the Senate and House would make it a refreshingly bipartisan initiative.

Pennsylvanians need to know there are creative options for funding the Hazardous Sites Cleanup Program that do not involve taking money from existing programs.

But time is running out, and legislators and the Governor need to act.

Brian J. Hill is president of the Pennsylvania Environmental Council.

 

`````````````````````````````````````````

 

NRA opposes Ellwood gun ordinance

 

Link: http://www.ellwoodcityledger.com/site/news.asp?brd=2724&pag=460&dept_id=563781

 

Mark E. Crepp, Ledger Staff

08/06/2007

 

ELLWOOD CITY - Despite a letter from the National Rifle Association protesting the ordinance, Ellwood City Council President Glenn Jones said he is not worried about enacting a prohibition on anyone carrying a firearm on borough property except certified police officers.

 

Mayor Don Clyde received a letter late last week from John Hohenwarter, the NRA's Pennsylvania liaison for state and local affairs, asking council to reexamine its enactment of the ordinance. Officials have said the ordinance is not targeting Clyde, 76, who has admitted to carrying a firearm while in the municipal building.

 

Jones said Monday he had not seen a copy of the letter, but he disputed an accusation by the NRA that the ban would be illegal.

 

Hohenwarter contacted Clyde early last week to discuss the ordinance and followed up their telephone conversation with a letter, Clyde said.

 

The letter says NRA attorneys have found the amendment to be in direct violation of Title 18, which limits government's regulation of firearms and ammunition. In addition, the ordinance may be in conflict with the state constitution, the letter says. 

 

"No county, municipality or township may in any manner regulate the lawful ownership, possession, transfer or transportation of firearms, ammunition or ammunition components when carried or transported for purposes not prohibited by the laws of this Commonwealth," the letter stated, according to Clyde, who added the letter quoted from the state Constitution, "The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the state shall not be questioned."

 

Jones said borough officials intend to move forward on the ordinance, even though the mayor has not decided whether to veto it. If no action is taken by Clyde by Aug. 20, it will automatically go into effect, Jones said.

 

Clyde has previously said the firearm ordinance was aimed at him because he has a concealed weapon permit and keeps a gun on his person while working in the municipal building.

 

During a July 16 meeting, Councilman Anthony "Lefty" DeCarbo, a retired police officer and chairman of the public safety committee, said he wanted to clarify that the ordinance he proposed was not aimed at Clyde.

 

DeCarbo said the ordinance, which was unanimously adopted, was because he saw an irate borough electric company customer having words with employees of the electric billing office in the municipal building.

 

He also wanted the ordinance adopted because he did not want people having weapons while in borough parks, noting that sometimes family or other gatherings in other municipalities have gotten out of hand. 

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

NRA-ILA

 

Clearing the Air on the Instant Check Bill

A recent U.S. House bill to improve the federal background check system has stirred up a flurry of misinformation. NRA-ILA sets the record straight.
Read More

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

For Immediate Release                                                                  Contact:           Jeanne K. Clark

August 3, 2007                                                                                                     412-258-6683

 

PennFutureConservationists Score Major Court Victory on Destruction from Mining;

Federal Court Rules Pennsylvania Must Require Coal Industry to

Post Bonds to Cover Entire Cost of Cleanup

 

Harrisburg, PA (August 3, 2007) –The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit yesterday gave a victory to Pennsylvania’s environment and economy by ruling in favor of a coalition represented by Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future (PennFuture) that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania must require the state’s coal operators to post bonds to cover the entire cost of environmental cleanup. The case began in December 2003, when PennFuture filed a lawsuit on behalf of Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs, Pennsylvania Council of Trout Unlimited (formerly PA Trout), the Pennsylvania Chapter of the Sierra Club, the Tri-State Citizens Mining Network (now known as the Center for Coalfield Justice) and the Mountain Watershed Association against both the federal and state governments for their failure to protect Pennsylvania’s environment from damage caused by mining operations, including acid stream pollution. 

 

PennFuture senior attorney Kurt Weist, who argued the case before the Third Circuit, said that “the court hit the fundamental point on the head. The federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act (SMCRA) requires mine operators to guarantee that all coal mines operated after August 3, 1977 will be fully reclaimed, with all toxic discharges treated to prevent stream pollution.” 

 

Weist added that “Pennsylvania has a legacy of over $15 billion in damage to clean up from mines abandoned before August 1977. Anglers and hunters, conservationists, tourism industry representatives and clean water advocates have been the leaders in the effort to prevent new mines and discharges from being added to that massive backlog. Now, the court has ruled with the citizens, and called for strong policies to protect our land, water and economy.”

 

"This decision vindicates the environmental community's assertion that coal companies cannot be trusted to fulfill their legal obligations, based on promises alone", said Jeff Schmidt, Director of the Sierra Club Pennsylvania Chapter. "This decision is especially poignant for the Sierra Club, since it comes on the 30th anniversary of the passage of SMCRA. Our longtime Sierra Club leader on mining issues, Wyona Coleman, was heavily involved in the original passage of SMCRA and also in getting this litigation initiated and continued. We only wish that Wyona had lived long enough to see the successful outcome of her litigation. We dedicate this win to Wyona Coleman, longtime citizen advocate for the people and environment of the coalfields," Schmidt concluded.

 

Pennsylvania’s sportsmen are leading the charge to stop the destruction of our environment,” said Melody Zullinger, Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs, “so we are very pleased with this decision. While we cannot change the past, we want to make sure that history does not repeat itself, with closed coal mines leaving a legacy of destroyed habitat and endangered wildlife.”

 

Terry Morrow, former chair and member of the Pennsylvania Council of Trout Unlimited environmental committee agreed. "We are pleased that this long effort has finally come to a positive conclusion. The ruling of the Court of Appeals provides encouragement to Pennsylvania Trout Unlimited that the commitments of time, effort and resources to restoring viable trout fisheries to streams in the coal regions of Pennsylvania are not in vain and have better chances of success and long-term sustainability. The membership of Pennsylvania Trout Unlimited, as well as others both now and in the future, will have enhanced opportunities to experience the recreation and spiritual refreshment that accompanies fishing unimpaired waters.”

 

Jim Kleissler, Executive Director of Center for Coalfield Justice also praised the ruling. “At last, we are seeing some justice for the people who live in the coalfields. They have been forced to live with polluted and undrinkable water and dangerous mine pits, all abandoned by coal operators. Finally, we have some hope that the coal industry will have to pay for the damages they cause.”

 

Mountain Watershed Association Executive Director Beverly Braverman lamented that the case was even necessary. “It is disheartening that our government officials had to be taken to court and forced to do the right thing. With an existing $15 billion backlog of old mine damage, it is crystal clear we need to take action to stop the problem from getting any worse. But the state has adopted policies that slashed the amount of revenue generated by its reclamation fee, and has even proposed to eliminate that fee entirely. The court’s ruling makes clear that those decisions took the state in the wrong direction.”

 

Under federal and state law, the Pennsylvania DEP has primary responsibility for regulating the state’s coal mining industry, with specific requirements that they guarantee that coal mines post bonds large enough to repair any environmental damage the mine may cause. This bonding requirement is crucial when coal operations cease to exist or if damage happens after the mine closes, as is frequently the case. The federal Office of Surface Mining (OSM) is responsible for monitoring the State’s regulatory program.

 

The PennFuture lawsuit came after both the state and federal governments had failed to meet these requirements. Today’s decision specifically overturns two 2003 rulings by OSM that DEP was fully complying with the law requiring the state to ensure that financial guarantees provided by mine operators were sufficient to clean up the pollution. DEP had adopted an “alternative bond system,” which relies on a statewide pool of funds to supplement bonds posted for each mine, which are consciously set below the entire cost of cleanup.

 

Late last year, a new federal law was enacted on abandoned mine lands reclamation that will bring Pennsylvania more than $1.36 billion, guaranteed, over the next 15 years. This money, geared to cover damage from prior to 1977, will likely cover only a portion of the past damage.

 

PennFuture is a statewide public interest membership organization that advances policies to protect and improve the state’s environment and economy. PennFuture’s activities include litigating cases before regulatory bodies and in local, state and federal courts, advocating and advancing legislative action on a state and federal level, public education and assisting citizens in public advocacy.

 

A copy of the Third Circuit decision is available for download on the PennFuture website, www.pennfuture.org

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

House Passes Farm Bill:  H.R. 2419

 

From TRCP:

On Friday, July 27th, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 2419, The Farm, Nutrition, and Bioenergy Act of 2007, commonly called the Farm Bill. As you know, this legislation represents the single greatest federal investment in conservation on private land. Over the course of many months, the collective voice of grassroots partners like you communicated the importance of a strong conservation title in the Farm Bill to those on Capitol Hill. Thank you for taking the time to make your voice heard; the results of your efforts are many positive elements in the conservation title of the House-passed bill.

Considering the current tight budget climate, we were fortunate to get many conservation programs reauthorized at previous levels and even see some increases and new funding. Positive elements in the House Farm Bill include:

"Open Fields" Open Fields is now included in a Farm Bill for the very first time and is one step closer to becoming a reality. This provision provides $20 million in funding to states enabling them to enhance or create state public access programs. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service indicates that the number one reason for the decline in hunting and fishing activities is lack of access. This will go a long way toward slowing this disturbing trend.

Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP) & Grassland Reserve Program (GRP) Restored Both WRP and GRP enter this new Farm Bill with no baseline funding. If new money is not found, then both programs face elimination. The House Farm Bill restores funding for WRP at 3.6 million acres and GRP at 1 million acres.

Increased funding for the Environmental Quality Incentive Program (EQIP) EQIP is the USDA's primary cost-share program for assisting farmers and ranchers seeking to meet conservation needs for soil, water, wetlands, and wildlife on working lands. The House bill increases EQIP by $1.1 billion over the next five years.

The 2007 Farm Bill now moves to the Senate's Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, where efforts are already under way to draft its own version. The same budgetary challenges present during the House process will also heavily influence the Senate. TRCP and the members of its Agriculture and Wildlife Working Group (AWWG) are looking forward to working closely with the senators and their staff to improve upon the good foundation for conservation laid in the House.

TRCP will also continue to engage sportsmen and -women like you and keep you informed on the latest developments. Thanks to your efforts, we have made significant progress so far. With your enduring help, we can continue to influence the debate and grow conservation in the Farm Bill.

 

From NWF:

 

The House of Representatives finished its work on the Farm Bill last week, voting to pass HR 2419 on a 231 to 191 vote.

Overall, the House Farm Bill represents only a few major changes from the current Farm Bill in terms of conservation programs and funding.

The bill includes a new Biomass Reserve Program, strongly supported by NWF, that would help farmers produce *next generation* energy sources like ethanol from