|
|
|
|
|
|
9 States Sue Over Mercury PA. challenges changes in federal regulations and WENDI HIMMELRIGHT The
York Dispatch Nine states, including The lawsuit, filed in federal court in The reductions aim to cut mercury
emissions from coal-burning power plants by nearly half within 15 years, but
opponents say the plan provides an out for the worst polluters by allowing
them to trade "pollution credits" with cleaner plants. "Mercury is an especially
dangerous pollutant," said Kathleen McGinty,
Secretary for the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.
"EPA was right previously in recognizing that mercury is hazardous, and
is wrong now in changing course. The president speaks of a 'culture of life.'
But his policy fails terribly to protect life from this neurotoxin. We hope
that he will direct EPA to act in keeping with his stated commitment to
life." Oppose rules rollback: At the same time, environmentalists are trying
to persuade legislatures to reject a proposal by President Approved by the Environmental
Protection Agency earlier this year, the Clean Air Interstate Rules require
targeted reductions in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides in two phases,
ultimately reducing the emissions over 2003 levels by 70 percent and 60
percent respectively. Bush has proposed an amendment, called
the "Clear Skies Initiative," that would exempt numerous industries
from its guidelines and extend the date for the industries to meet the
targets. Would extend deadline: PPL's They could also ignore a directive to
reduce mercury emissions to the maximum extent (about 90 percent) possible by
2008. Since 1990, the plant has reduced
sulfur dioxide emissions by about 25 percent, but it still released 68,932
tons of sulfur dioxide into the PPL Corp. said earlier this year it
will invest $400 million by 2008 in a system to clean pollutants from smoke
that leaves its Chairman William Hecht has said that
will keep the organization ahead of tightening federal regulations and allow
the power company to sell emissions allowances to other companies. PPL spokeswoman Constance Walker said
that makes "economic sense" to the company, and she didn't know if
the company would elect to opt out of the regulations if given the chance. http://www.yorkdispatch.com/Stories/0,1413,138~10025~2799411,00.html |