Providing leadership and advocacy for the enhancement of fish and wildlife resources for the benefit of all hunters, anglers and conservationists.

Protecting our 2nd Amendment Rights

 


 

SAVE SPRING CREEK CANYON

Oppose HB 1657

 

 

 

 

PFSC Letter to Governor Rendell  February 2007

 

PFSC Testimony – House State Government Hearing in Centre Co. October 25, 2007

 

Letters to the Governor & House State Committee Members  Updated 1-3-08

 

Other Testimony to Committee

 

 

History & Concerns:  Updated 12/6/07

 

November 28, 2007

 

The Honorable Babette Josephs

Majority Chair, House State Government Committee

300 Main Capitol Building

Harrisburg, PA 17120

 

The Honorable Matthew Baker

Minority Chair, House State Government Committee

3 East Wing

Harrisburg, PA 17120

 

    Re: October 25, 2007 legislative hearing, Pleasant Gap PA

 

Dear Representatives Josephs and Baker:

 

The Spring Creek Canyon Alliance, composed of 21 local and state-wide hunter/angler/conservation groups with over 150,000 members, requests that the House State Government Committee reject HB 1657. 

 

We do so because we believe the process leading to this legislation is seriously flawed and the bill, if enacted, will lead to the long-term degradation of Spring Creek Canyon and the adjacent highlands.

 

At the hearing, Rep. Mike Hanna, the sponsor of the bill, confirmed our view that the existing process leading to divestment is inherently flawed and promised to fix it in time for the next land transfer.   But the divestiture of the Spring Creek Canyon lands is no ordinary land transfer, and it should not be subjected to a defective process.  This large tract has been in State ownership for over 100 years and should not be summarily transferred to a private entity without substantial public involvement.  In fact, the public has been entirely excluded from the process of divestment. 

Spring Creek and the surrounding bluffs are of exceptional value, not only to the local community, but to anglers who come from around the country to fish this world-class trout fishery.   The bluffs are habitat for 11 species of plants and animals, some of which are globally rare and found only in the Spring Creek Canyon.  To protect this resource, the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy’s report, funded by the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, stated that the only way to provide for the long-term protection of the Canyon and the superb brown trout fishery is to reforest the uplands.   This reforestation does not need to occur instantly, but can be gradually implemented.

 

Since the process of divestment did not provide any opportunity for public input, the majority of the public does not support this legislation.  We ask that you reject HB 1657 and fix the flawed divestiture process acknowledged by Mr. Hanna so that the public can be intimately involved in deciding future ownership. 

 

Once the desired future uses of the land have been determined, a management plan prescribing the methods for the enhancement and preservation of the area should be developed.  Only then should future ownership be decided.  The ownership decision should be based on whether the mission of the prospective owner is consistent with the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy’s recommendations and whether the prospective owner has the funds and expertise to restore and protect this ecological gem into the foreseeable future

 

We have included specific concerns with the process leading up to HB 1657, and the lack of long term protections it provides to the Canyon, as an attachment to this letter.

 

Thank you for considering our views.

 

Sincerely,

Edward Perry

Coordinator

Spring Creek Canyon Alliance

 

cc:  Members of the House State Government Committee

       Representative Mike Hanna

       Representative Scott Conklin

       Senator Jake Corman

 

Attachment:

Specific Concerns

 

·        Contrary to statements made at the October 25 legislative hearing, the pubic has not had any opportunity to participate in the process of determining who should own this land.  The public does not know why, where, when or by whom this land was initially declared surplus.  There was no opportunity for public input.

·        The public does not know why, where, when or by whom it was decided  that Penn State University, Benner Township and the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission were to become  the new owners of these lands.  There was no opportunity for public input into this decision. 

·        Because Penn State’s waste water spraying operation has adversely affected 950 acres of State Game Lands 176 near Toftrees, in violation of the federal Pittman-Robertson Act, the US Fish and Wildlife Service required Penn State to place $8.3 million in escrow for the Game Commission to purchase suitable replacement land within a 60 mile radius of State College.  This replacement land must be found by February 2008 or the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service may require that the 950 acres be returned to the Pennsylvania Game Commission.   Should this happen, the Fish and Wildlife Service will likely require that spraying treated wastewater (the” Living Filter”) onto these lands be terminated.  This would create a major problem of wastewater disposal for the State College area.  Transferring the Canyon lands to the Pennsylvania Game Commission would solve these problems. 

·        HB 1657 transfers ownership of the Spring Creek Canyon to Benner Township who has stated they do not have the funds or expertise to manage this unique ecological resource and provide long-term protection.    Although we believe the present Benner Township Supervisors are sincerely interested in protecting the Canyon, it is apparent they will need substantial technical and financial assistance to provide the Canyon with the protection and restoration it needs.  It is irresponsible to transfer ownership to an entity that is poorly equipped to manage this resource.

·        Benner Township, in collaboration with DCNR, is undertaking development of a master plan for the Canyon and the adjacent highlands.  The project is to be overseen by a Steering Committee “led by a representative of Benner Township and comprised of a representative of each of the other anticipated future landowners” with several ex officio members.  This arrangement is flawed because it presumes ownership before ownership has even been decided.  With this leadership, the master plan will be crafted to benefit the expected future owners and not to provide optimum protection for the Canyon and maximum benefits for the citizens of Pennsylvania.   Our position is that a master plan must be developed without any presumption of ownership, with ownership transferred to the entity best qualified to implement the plan. This master planning effort now being led by Benner Township should be halted.

·        Representative Hanna has said that he will propose amendments to his bill that will require a conservation easement be negotiated between the ClearWater Conservancy and each of the new owners.  The easements must be in place within two years of the date of transfer of ownership.    Providing a two year period for execution of the conservation easement is an obvious effort to quickly transfer ownership before the complexities of a conservation easement are resolved.

·        Penn State has said it will use its Canyon lands for agricultural education and research.  The proximity of agricultural activity to the sensitive habitats of the Canyon and to Spring Creek poses serious potential threats to the biological integrity of the area.  Moreover, fertilizers, pesticides and storm water run-off will continue to degrade Spring Creek. 

·        In a state-funded ecological assessment of Spring Creek Canyon, the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy   has confirmed the biological value of the area and has made recommendations to protect and restore the area.  These recommendations are based on established science.  Despite the fact that the DCNR funded this study, it is clear they are ignoring these recommendations.  The Conservancy’s report should be the basis of any management plan that will be developed.

·        The Pennsylvania Game Commission has offered to pay $1,800 per acre, which is twice what Penn State has offered.  Why has the Game Commission’s offer not been accepted?

 

 

 

Background:  June 2007

 

Action Alert

The State Is Giving Away Our Land!

 

The Rendell Administration proposes to transfer 1800 acres of land along Spring Creek in Centre County to Benner Township and Penn State University.  Benner Township is to receive the canyon portion of the property that includes Spring Creek to the top of the bluff.  The Department of Conservation and Natural Resources has told Benner Township to act as if PSU is going to get the uplands above the bluff.  The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission will hold land at each end of the canyon, essentially being the gatekeeper.  The attached map shows the approximate boundaries of the property outlined in blue.

 

We are concerned for the long-term future of this property.  It lies adjacent to an I-99 interchange, halfway between Bellefonte and State College.  In takes little imagination to envision that some years into the future the upland portion of the property that is scheduled to be transferred to PSU will eventually be some sort of development, notwithstanding PSU’s present interest in agriculture.

 

To ensure this land can never be sold for development, the Moshannon Group of the Sierra Club supports transferring this land to the Pennsylvania Game Commission. 

 

The Game Commission needs this land to replace about 900 acres of Game Lands  Penn State adversely affected by spraying treated sewage on the property.  The US Fish and Wildlife Service informed the Game Commission this violated Federal regulations as the use of the land for hunting and wildlife had been adversely affected.  Instead of helping the Game Commission obtain the Rockview property, Penn State has actively thwarted them.

 

We have an unprecedented opportunity to make this parcel a major asset to the surrounding communities by revegetating the uplands with warm season grasses, that will provide habitat for grassland birds, pheasants, and other wildlife typically found in large expanses of grassland habitat.  Shrub and grassland habitat will be a bird watchers paradise and protect the water quality in Spring Creek.   Interpretive trails will educate young and old alike to the wonders of nature and providing a natural area in an urbanizing environment.  Pheasant stocking will allow fall hunting.  In short, this area could be a major asset to the community.

 

Sportsmen’s groups and conservationists have already announced their opposition to transferring the land to entities that do not have the mandate to protect land in its natural state.

 

We ask that you join with us to ensure that the land is protected in perpetuity for use by hunters and recreationists, as well as providing outstanding habitat for wildlife, by supporting the transfer of this land to the Pennsylvania Game Commission.

 

Time is of the essence.  Senator Corman has draft legislation that would give this land to Penn State and Benner Township, but he has assured the conservation community he would not move legislation until there is consensus.  Representative Hanna strongly opposes the Game Commission receiving this land and has stated this land should be transferred as soon as possible to Penn State and Benner Township.

 

Please contact your legislator and ask them to oppose any legislation that would transfer this land to Penn State and Benner Township.  Ask that the Governor not be permitted to give this priceless land to Penn State.  Ask that the Game Commission be allowed to purchase this land.  The Game Commission has actually offered to pay twice the amount Penn State has offered.

 

Please contact Ed Perry at 814-466-7060 or email at ep1966@comcast.net to join our coalition or help spread the word.

 

 

Background Information

 

For the past 3 years, the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR), at the direction of the Rendell Administration, has been attempting to transfer about 1800 acres of land owned by Rockview Penitentiary, to Penn State University (PSU), and Benner Township.  Rockview Penitentiary has owned this land for many years and has farmed the upland portion in the past.  However, but except for a small area, most of the property has not been farmed for over 10 years.  

 

The property to be transferred extends roughly from Fisherman’s Paradise about 2 ½ miles upstream to Rock Run Road, and includes the Spring Creek Canyon and about 1400 acres of uplands adjacent to the canyon (see attached map).   Benner Township is scheduled to receive the canyon portion of the property, extending from Spring Creek to the top of the bluff.  The DCNR has told Benner Township to act as if PSU is going to get the uplands above the bluff.  The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission will hold land at each end of the canyon, essentially being the gatekeeper.

 

The DCNR gave $30,000 to the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy (WPC) to produce a report that addressed the natural resource values of the property.  In December 2006, WPC presented their report to the Benner Township which discussed the value of Spring Creek Canyon for natural communities stating

 

 “The Spring Creek Valley is an extremely unique area in the county and the state.  The creek itself is a world-class trout fishery and hatchery, because it is enriched with minerals from the surrounding subsurface limestone geology, and because it is surrounded by natural vegetation that helps preserve the water quality.” 

 

The WPC pointed out that the Spring Creek Valley was given the highest ranking of Exceptional Significance as a Biological Diversity Area in the Centre County Natural Heritage Inventory report of 2002.  Their field studies and research found that nine species of special concern have been documented to live in the valley within the past 10 years.  Although the WPC report made 16 recommendations, the most significant were that: 1) invasive species should be controlled; 2) uplands adjacent to the canyon should be reforested; 3) the amount of roads should be reduced; 4) pesticides should be prohibited; and, 5) an ecologically

based management plan should be developed.

 

The WPC’s recommendations for reforestation have not been supported by Benner Township, Penn State University, or DCNR.  PSU intends to conduct production agriculture on the uplands, and conduct agricultural research.  The DCNR now proposes to spend more state funds for a grant to develop a Master Plan for the area.

 

Spring Creek Valley Ecological Assessment          

        Because of the public forum in January, the Benner Township Supervisors pressed to have an environmental assessment of the canyon parcel completed as soon as possible. DCNR stepped forward and approved a grant to authorize a three-part study: an environmental assessment, a management plan and a master plan. The Township was permitted to advance the environmental part only, until land ownership transferred. The study began in May 2006 with the consultant, The Western PA Conservancy, conducting field audits of plant and animal species within the canyon. Benner also received the ok to establish a Citizens' Advisory Committee to offer input and feedback to the consultant. The consultant's final report can be viewed by clicking the links below.  (Note: this is a large report and takes a while to download.)

Spring Creek Valley Ecological Assessment Report 12-29-06

Spring Creek Valley Ecological Assessment Annotated Bibliography

Benner Township Information Page

 

 

Spring Creek Canyon Alliance

 

Statement of Concern and Recommendations

 

We the undersigned hereby submit this Statement of Concern and Recommendations for the permanent conservation of 1,800 acres of Rockview Penitentiary property that includes the Spring Creek Canyon and surrounding uplands.  We respectfully request the State of Pennsylvania transfer stewardship of these 1,800 acres to the Pennsylvania Game Commission for their management of the land for Pennsylvania’s wildlife resources.

 

The following lists the reasons for our position:

 

1)      Spring Creek is a world-class trout fishery, and the surrounding cliffs are habitat for nine State-listed species of plants and animals that are globally rare, or rare in Pennsylvania.  Transferring this property to entities that do not have the expertise, funding, or mandate to protect this ecosystem in its natural state is not in the best interests of this resource or the surrounding community.

 

2)      The 1,800 acres of land propose to be transferred includes land classified by the Western Pennsylvania Conservancy as a Biological Diversity Area (BDA). A BDA is an area containing natural features that are important in the support of plants or animals of special concern at either state or federal levels that has exemplary natural communities, or exceptional native biodiversity.   The BDA extends from the bottom to the canyon to the uplands surrounding the canyon.  A substantial buffer is necessary to protect the unique and sensitive ecological features in the canyon.

 

3)      The Western Pennsylvania Conservancy’s December 29, 2006, report entitled: Ecological Assessment and Planning for the Spring Creek Biological Diversity Area states that: “The Spring Creek Valley is a truly exceptional resource because of its diversity and uniqueness, and in comparison to other remaining communities of its type, it is extensive in size and in good ecological health.”

 

4)      The Pennsylvania and the Centre County Natural Heritage Inventories states that the canyon requires exceptional protection. 

 

5)      Due to the special resources within the Canyon, and their sensitivity to disturbance and pollution, the Conservancy recommended that all 1,800 acres either remain or revert to forest or forest buffer lands to protect the Spring Creek Valley 

 

6)      Finally, we are concerned with the long term future of this property.  This land lies halfway between Bellefonte and State College, adjacent to an I 99 interchange in a rapidly urbanizing environment.  Due to its extraordinarily high potential for development, it is imperative this land be transferred to an entity that has the mandate, expertise, and funds to hold and manage this land in its natural state in perpetuity.  The Pennsylvania Game Commission is the only entity that can meet those criteria.

 

PA Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs

PA Council of Trout Unlimited

Spring Creek Chapter of Trout Unlimited

Adams County Chapter of Trout Unlimited

Moshannon Group, Sierra Club

PA Chapter, Sierra Club

State College Bird Club

Fly Fishers Paradise

United Bow Hunters of Pennsylvania

Juniata Valley Audubon

Centre County Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs

Adams County Federation of Sportsmen's Clubs

Coalition for Open Space Preservation

PA Chapter of National Wild Turkey Federation

Nittany Mountain Biking Association.